��ݮ��Ƶ

In spite of around-the-clock news coverage that communicated updated forecasts from the National Hurricane Center (NHC), the intensity of Hurricane Ian and Hurricane Nicole, both of which tore through Florida recently, causing severe property damage and flooding throughout the state, was underestimated by many residents before the storms made landfall. 

To two Meteorology professors at ��ݮ��Ƶ, however, the way these storms intensified, and how residents responded, are part of a much larger pattern.

“Ian was one of several hurricanes to rapidly intensify in this way in the past five years,” said Dr. Dan Halperin, assistant professor of Meteorology. “In these scenarios, people who only prepare for weaker storms can be caught off-guard.”

That’s why Halperin, along with fellow Meteorology assistant professor and co-principal investigator Rob Eicher are currently working on a project funded by NOAA to better communicate storm uncertainty in the future.

“Quite often, forecasters know there is a possibility that a hurricane could suddenly strengthen or weaken before landfall and will communicate that in a forecast discussion, but there is no product that objectively warns people how much stronger, or weaker, a hurricane could be,” Eicher said. “The NHC is developing a method to include uncertainty information in their landfall intensity forecasts, and our project will provide recommendations on how best to communicate that information publicly.”

In other words, a potential forecast product would allow forecasters to explain to audiences a storm’s probable scenario — “Hurricane X will mostly likely produce winds of 75 mph,” for example — in addition to providing a reasonable worst-case scenario — “Hurricane X will mostly likely produce winds of 75 mph, but there is a 10% chance of winds exceeding 110 mph.&rdquo

“Our goal is to raise awareness of the uncertainty in tropical cyclone intensity forecasts so that people will prepare for the reasonable worst-case scenario,” Halperin added. “Ian and Nicole are just two recent examples of the fact that you should always prepare for the worst.”

The project is a collaboration between Embry-Riddle researchers and Deanna Sellnow, professor of strategic communication at the University of Central Florida (UCF), where Eicher is currently pursuing his Ph.D. in the same topic, with a concentration in risk communication. Any potential new forecast graphic is expected to be used in tandem with the NHC’s tropical cyclone forecast track graphic (or “cone of uncertainty”), which illustrates the probable track of the center of a tropical cyclone.

Although the cone graphic illustrates the wide array of possibilities for a storm’s projected path, there is currently no tool or graphic that objectively communicates uncertainty in intensity forecasts.

“Hurricane track forecasts have improved significantly over the last two decades, but hurricane intensity forecasts remain a challenge,” Eicher said. “So, we are concentrating strictly on the intensity forecast in this project.”

One to two Embry-Riddle undergraduate students will also be involved in the research. Eicher plans to feature the project in his Ph.D. dissertation, as well, which will apply chaos theory to forecasting tools in order to reinforce levels of uncertainty in intensity predictions.

This type of reinforcement is necessary, according to the researchers, who expressed concern that the general public is quick to become “anchored” to an initial hurricane forecast, which can lead to a lack of awareness when a situation has changed.